<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-16T16:57:33Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:lifeofresearch.com:13" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://lifeofresearch.com/oai2</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:lifeofresearch.com:13</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-22T17:33:56Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>type:article</setSpec>
        <setSpec>openaire</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
        <dc:title>Cross-Lingual Hallucination Patterns in Indic Languages: A Typology-Aware Research Agenda for Dravidian and Indo-Aryan Comparison</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Pranay Mahendrakar</dc:creator>
        <dc:description>Multilingual hallucination in large language models has begun to receive systematic attention. Recent work has measured
aggregate hallucination rates across 19 to 30 languages (FACTSCORE-multilingual, MFAVA, Poly-FEVER), introduced
multilingual benchmarks (HalluVerseM3, BHRAM-IL for some Indo-Aryan languages), and demonstrated that LLMs hallucinate
more in low-resource languages than in English. What this growing literature does not yet provide is a typology-aware
comparison of how hallucination patterns — not just rates — differ across closely-related languages. The Dravidian languages
(Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam) and the Indo-Aryan languages (Hindi, Marathi, Bengali, Gujarati) of India offer a natural
experimental setting: substantial variation in training data quantity, sharply different morphological typology (Dravidian
agglutination versus Indo-Aryan fusion, presence or absence of grammatical gender), shared script families in some cases, and
pervasive code-mixing with English in real use. This paper makes three claims. First, the question &quot;how often does the model
hallucinate in language X&quot; is the wrong primary question; the more informative question is &quot;which categories of hallucination
dominate in language X, and why.&quot; Second, four hypotheses about Indic-language hallucination patterns can be distinguished
empirically and have meaningful policy and research implications. Third, the experimental work needed to test these
hypotheses is small enough that a single research team in India could execute it within a year. We propose a measurement
framework, a concrete experimental protocol, and a case for why this question is particularly tractable in the Indian research
context.</dc:description>
        <dc:publisher>Life of Research</dc:publisher>
        <dc:date>2026-04-28</dc:date>
        <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
        <dc:identifier>https://lifeofresearch.com/articles/13</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19854165</dc:identifier>
        <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
        <dc:relation>https://lifeofresearch.com/articles/13/files/13/CrossLingual_Hallucination_Indic_Mahendrakar.pdf</dc:relation>
        <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
        <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
        <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>