The Rabbit Hole Is Five Claims, Not One: Why Audits, Browsing Panels, Escalation Studies, Exposure Experiments and Discourse Maps of Online Conspiracy Content Keep Disagreeing

APA

Mahendrakar, P. (2026). The Rabbit Hole Is Five Claims, Not One: Why Audits, Browsing Panels, Escalation Studies, Exposure Experiments and Discourse Maps of Online Conspiracy Content Keep Disagreeing [Preprint]. Life of Research. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23619244

Copy APA

BibTeX

@misc{lor1352026,
  title        = {The Rabbit Hole Is Five Claims, Not One: Why Audits, Browsing Panels, Escalation Studies, Exposure Experiments and Discourse Maps of Online Conspiracy Content Keep Disagreeing},
  author       = {Pranay Mahendrakar},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Life of Research},
  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.23619244},
  url          = {https://lifeofresearch.com/preprints/135},
  keywords     = {recommender systems, algorithmic amplification, conspiracy theories, online radicalization, echo chambers, sock-puppet audits, research design, causal identification},
  note         = {LOR-00135}
}

Copy BibTeX More on the record page