Life of Research
Appearance

Subject

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards

8 open-access journal articles on reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards, published in 2026 in Life of Research. Every record is free to read and download, with a permanent link and a ready-made citation.

8 records

Journal article

Does a Model Forget Differently When the Data Is Its Own? RL's Retention Advantage and Model Collapse Are Claims About the Same Loop, and No Study Has Measured Both

Two literatures make claims about what happens when a language model trains on data that resembles its own distribution. One asks whether reinforcement learning forgets a model's prior capabilities less than supervised fine-tuning does, and answers yes: on-policy RL is implicitly biased toward…

Cite Related research LOR-00052 · 8 views · 31 downloads
PDF9.3 MB

Journal article

Curriculum Is Three Claims, Not One: Ordering, Selection and Decomposition in RLVR, and the Random-Order Control Almost Nobody Runs

Curriculum learning entered large-scale reasoning training through reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR): difficulty-ordered or difficulty-filtered problem schedules are now routine in systems built on GRPO and DAPO, and dozens of 2024-2026 papers report a gain from some version of…

Cite Related research LOR-00051 · 6 views · 34 downloads
PDF5.8 MB

Journal article

The Reassessment That Did Not Travel: What the 2020 Arcade Result About Exploration Bonuses Establishes, the Six Conditions That Made It Informative, and Which of Them the Language-Model Revival Drops

Between 2025 and 2026 at least six frameworks added an intrinsic novelty or uncertainty term to reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards for language models, each naming a classical antecedent - prediction error, pseudo-counts, epistemic uncertainty - and each reporting gains. The classical…

Cite Related research LOR-00067 · 7 views · 6 downloads
PDF475.5 KB

Journal article

The Reassessment That Did Not Travel: What the 2020 Arcade Result About Exploration Bonuses Establishes, the Six Conditions That Made It Informative, and Which of Them the Language-Model Revival Drops

Between 2025 and 2026 at least six frameworks added an intrinsic novelty or uncertainty term to reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards for language models, each naming a classical antecedent - prediction error, pseudo-counts, epistemic uncertainty - and each reporting gains. The classical…

Cite Related research LOR-00025 · 5 views · 26 downloads
PDF473.4 KB

Journal article

Transfer Is a Directed Relation: Four Quantities Under One Word in the Cross-Domain RLVR Debate, and Why the Structural-Similarity Reading Does Not Survive Its Own Evidence

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards is the standard route to reasoning-tuned language models, and the field has split over whether its gains leave the training domain. One body of work reports that most models succeeding at mathematics fail to transfer and that single-domain…

Cite Related research LOR-00066 · 8 views · 30 downloads
PDF475.6 KB

Journal article

Transfer Is a Directed Relation: Four Quantities Under One Word in the Cross-Domain RLVR Debate, and Why the Structural-Similarity Reading Does Not Survive Its Own Evidence

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards is the standard route to reasoning-tuned language models, and the field has split over whether its gains leave the training domain. One body of work reports that most models succeeding at mathematics fail to transfer and that single-domain…

Cite Related research LOR-00031 · 5 views · 5 downloads
PDF473.3 KB

Journal article

The Crossover Does Not Carry the Claim: Pass@k Inversion, the Reasoning Boundary, and Five Premises the RLVR Debate Leaves Unstated

A model trained with reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards beats its base model at one sample and loses to it at many. The field has read that crossover as a measurement of the reasoning boundary and has spent two years arguing about which direction the boundary moved. This paper…

Cite Related research LOR-00072 · 7 views · 9 downloads
PDF461 KB

Journal article

The Crossover Does Not Carry the Claim: Pass@k Inversion, the Reasoning Boundary, and Five Premises the RLVR Debate Leaves Unstated

A model trained with reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards beats its base model at one sample and loses to it at many. The field has read that crossover as a measurement of the reasoning boundary and has spent two years arguing about which direction the boundary moved. This paper…

Cite Related research LOR-00034 · 6 views · 29 downloads
PDF457.3 KB

Cite

APA

BibTeX


  
  

Import into a reference manager: BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote)