Life of Research
Appearance
Preprint Open access CC BY 4.0 Version 2

PECA v3: Evidence-Gated Anticipatory Execution: Separating Requirement Compliance, Predictive Utility, and Commit Authorization in AI Agents

  • RM369

Preprint

LOR-00140

Download PDF (79.2 KB) Cite

Cite

PECA v3: Evidence-Gated Anticipatory Execution: Separating Requirement Compliance, Predictive Utility, and Commit Authorization in AI Agents

Read

Abstract

Anticipation can help an AI agent prepare useful work before a requirement is fully specified, but a predictor can also create the very obligations the agent then tries to satisfy. PECA v3 refactors Prefix-Conditioned Execution and Cumulative Audit around a strict separation among confirmed requirements, provisional predictions, and the mutable artifact with its provenance. The controller preserves the state triple (R_h,R_p,S), but makes the distinction operational: compliance is judged only against active, evidence-supported requirements in R_h; predictions in R_p are evaluated separately for utility, calibration, and waste; and external or consequential changes pass through action-specific authorization and commit gates. Each action carries a contract covering evidence, preconditions, expected effects, verification, side effects, reversibility, and commit criteria. The design favors preparation useful across several plausible futures, permits isolated branch-specific speculation only when its expected value is positive, and combines material-cycle checkpoints with event-triggered reviews. The nested 3-6-9 cadence is retained as an ablatable scheduling hypothesis, not a source of correctness. This paper defines the architecture and a controlled evaluation plan. It reports no live-model performance results and makes no claim that the proposed controller is superior until matched, independently evaluated experiments establish that fact.

Keywords

Files (1)

Cite this record

RM369. (2026). PECA v3: Evidence-Gated Anticipatory Execution: Separating Requirement Compliance, Predictive Utility, and Commit Authorization in AI Agents [Preprint]. Life of Research. https://lifeofresearch.com/preprints/140

APA 7th edition
Export to a reference manager
BibTeX
@misc{rm3692026peca,
  author       = {{RM369}},
  title        = {{PECA v3: Evidence-Gated Anticipatory Execution: Separating Requirement Compliance, Predictive Utility, and Commit Authorization in AI Agents}},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = oct,
  date         = {2026-10-26},
  publisher    = {Life of Research},
  howpublished = {Preprint},
  url          = {https://lifeofresearch.com/preprints/140},
  abstract     = {Anticipation can help an AI agent prepare useful work before a requirement is fully specified, but a predictor can also create the very obligations the agent then tries to satisfy. PECA v3 refactors Prefix-Conditioned Execution and Cumulative Audit around a strict separation among confirmed requirements, provisional predictions, and the mutable artifact with its provenance. The controller preserves the state triple (R\_h,R\_p,S), but makes the distinction operational: compliance is judged only against active, evidence-supported requirements in R\_h; predictions in R\_p are evaluated separately for utility, calibration, and waste; and external or consequential changes pass through action-specific authorization and commit gates. Each action carries a contract covering evidence, preconditions, expected effects, verification, side effects, reversibility, and commit criteria. The design favors preparation useful across several plausible futures, permits isolated branch-specific speculation only when its expected value is positive, and combines material-cycle checkpoints with event-triggered reviews. The nested 3-6-9 cadence is retained as an ablatable scheduling hypothesis, not a source of correctness. This paper defines the architecture and a controlled evaluation plan. It reports no live-model performance results and makes no claim that the proposed controller is superior until matched, independently evaluated experiments establish that fact.},
  keywords     = {AI agents, instruction following, speculative execution, runtime verification, auditability, action contracts, reversibility, reward hacking},
  language     = {en},
  copyright    = {Creative Commons Attribution 4.0}
}

Using Zotero or Mendeley? Their browser connector saves this record from this page, with its PDF when there is one. On search and browse pages it lists every result so you can save many at once.

Guides How to cite a preprint Preprints vs journal articles What CC BY 4.0 allows