Life of Research
Appearance

A Physics-Constrained Decision Framework for Orbital-Debris Intervention Search

  • Mahib Sadman

Journal article

LOR-00145

Download PDF (1.4 MB) Also on Google Drive Cite

Cite

A Physics-Constrained Decision Framework for Orbital-Debris Intervention Search

Read

Abstract

Orbital debris presents a growing challenge to space sustainability, satellite operations, and the long-term safety of Earth's orbital environment. Selecting an appropriate debris intervention strategy requires consideration of orbital mechanics, mission feasibility, cost, uncertainty, and potential side effects.

This research proposal presents a Physics-Constrained Decision Framework for Orbital-Debris Intervention Search, a proposed software-based approach for comparing and evaluating possible debris intervention strategies. The framework is intended to combine physical feasibility checks, risk assessment, uncertainty analysis, cost considerations, and transparent decision criteria.

Its proposed contribution is an auditable intervention certificate that records the rationale behind a recommendation, the assumptions and uncertainties involved, potential risks and costs, alternative strategies considered, and conditions under which a recommendation should be rejected or reassessed.

The objective is to improve the transparency, reproducibility, and accountability of orbital-debris intervention planning. The framework is a conceptual research proposal rather than a validated operational system. Its originality requires further prior-art investigation, and its effectiveness must be evaluated through implementation, simulations, comparative benchmarks, and sensitivity analysis.

The proposed work may be relevant to research in orbital-debris mitigation, space sustainability, mission planning, and decision-support systems. It is intended to provide a foundation for future technical investigation and potential collaboration with researchers and space agencies.

Keywords

Files (1)

The full file (full version) is hosted on Google Drive:

Open on Google Drive https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ACqWzNkA6Avp3g71k7rImY-wETnX7rf6/view?usp=drivesdk

Cite this record

Sadman, M. (2026). A Physics-Constrained Decision Framework for Orbital-Debris Intervention Search. Life of Research. https://lifeofresearch.com/articles/145

APA 7th edition
Export to a reference manager
BibTeX
@misc{sadman2026physics,
  author       = {Sadman, Mahib},
  title        = {{A Physics-Constrained Decision Framework for Orbital-Debris Intervention Search}},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = oct,
  date         = {2026-10-27},
  publisher    = {Life of Research},
  url          = {https://lifeofresearch.com/articles/145},
  abstract     = {Orbital debris presents a growing challenge to space sustainability, satellite operations, and the long-term safety of Earth's orbital environment. Selecting an appropriate debris intervention strategy requires consideration of orbital mechanics, mission feasibility, cost, uncertainty, and potential side effects.

This research proposal presents a Physics-Constrained Decision Framework for Orbital-Debris Intervention Search, a proposed software-based approach for comparing and evaluating possible debris intervention strategies. The framework is intended to combine physical feasibility checks, risk assessment, uncertainty analysis, cost considerations, and transparent decision criteria.

Its proposed contribution is an auditable intervention certificate that records the rationale behind a recommendation, the assumptions and uncertainties involved, potential risks and costs, alternative strategies considered, and conditions under which a recommendation should be rejected or reassessed.

The objective is to improve the transparency, reproducibility, and accountability of orbital-debris intervention planning. The framework is a conceptual research proposal rather than a validated operational system. Its originality requires further prior-art investigation, and its effectiveness must be evaluated through implementation, simulations, comparative benchmarks, and sensitivity analysis.

The proposed work may be relevant to research in orbital-debris mitigation, space sustainability, mission planning, and decision-support systems. It is intended to provide a foundation for future technical investigation and potential collaboration with researchers and space agencies.},
  keywords     = {Orbital Debris, Space Debris Mitigation, Active Debris Removal, Orbital Mechanics, Space Sustainability, Physics-Constrained Optimization, Decision-Support Systems, Uncertainty Quantification, Risk Assessment, Mission Planning, Multi-Objective Optimization, Space Situational Awareness, Collision Risk Analysis, Autonomous Decision-Making, Space Systems Engineering},
  language     = {en},
  copyright    = {Creative Commons Attribution 4.0}
}

Using Zotero or Mendeley? Their browser connector saves this record from this page, with its PDF when there is one. On search and browse pages it lists every result so you can save many at once.

Guides What a complete citation needs What CC BY 4.0 allows

References (31)

  1. NASA Small Spacecraft Systems Virtual Institute. “Deorbit Systems,” State-of-the-Art of Small Spacecraft Technology (2026). https://www.nasa.gov/smallsat-institute/sst-soa/deorbit-systems/
  2. NASA Orbital Debris Program Office. “Orbital Debris Mitigation Standard Practices.” https://orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/mitigation/
  3. Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee. “IADC Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines.” https://www.iadc-home.org/
  4. NASA. “Advanced Control and Evolvable Systems Group.” https://www.nasa.gov/intelligent-systems-division/autonomous-systems-and-robotics/aces-group/
  5. Agrawal, A. K., McHale, J., & Oettl, A. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Scientific Discovery: A Model of Prioritized Search. NBER Working Paper 31558. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31558
  6. Kessler, D. J., & Cour-Palais, B. G. (1978). Collision Frequency of Artificial Satellites: The Creation of a Debris Belt. Journal of Geophysical Research, 83(A6), 2637–2646. https://doi.org/10.1029/ja083ia06p02637
  7. NASA Office of Technology, Policy, and Strategy. (2024). Cost and Benefit Analysis of Mitigating, Tracking, and Remediating Orbital Debris. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20240003484
  8. NASA TechPort. Adaptive Just-in-time Collision Avoidance via Targeted Dust Cloud Deployments from Orbital Platforms. Project 156380. https://techport.nasa.gov/projects/156380
  9. NASA TechPort. Rapid Response Debris Removal Using Reconfigurable Space-Based Laser Networks. Project 156377. https://techport.nasa.gov/projects/156377
  10. NASA Office of Inspector General. (2021). NASA’s Efforts to Mitigate the Risks Posed by Orbital Debris. Report IG-21-011. https://oig.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/ig-21-011.pdf
  11. European Space Agency. Space Debris. https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/Space_Debris
  12. European Space Agency. ClearSpace-1. https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/ClearSpace-1
Show all 31 references
  1. IEEE. Resources, Forms, and Templates for IEEE Conferences. https://events.ieee.org/forms-and-templates/
  2. NASA. Micrometeoroids and Orbital Debris. https://www.nasa.gov/centers-and-facilities/white-sands/micrometeoroids-and-orbital-debris-mmod/
  3. NASA TechPort. Space Debris Elimination (SpaDE). Project 4347. https://techport.nasa.gov/projects/4347
  4. NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS). NASA technical reports and research publications. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/
  5. NASA TechPort. NASA technology research and development portfolio. https://techport.nasa.gov/
  6. World Intellectual Property Organization. PATENTSCOPE. https://patentscope.wipo.int/
  7. European Patent Office. Espacenet Patent Search. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/
  8. Google. Google Patents. https://patents.google.com/
  9. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs. Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines. https://www.unoosa.org/
  10. NASA. (2016). Systems Engineering Handbook (NASA/SP-2016-6105 Rev. 2). https://www.nasa.gov/reference/systems-engineering-handbook/
  11. IEEE. Manuscript Templates for Conference Proceedings. https://www.ieee.org/conferences/publishing/templates.html
  12. “AI-driven collision risk prediction and debris optimization in low earth orbit.” (2026). Scientific Reports. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-55288-0
  13. NASA TechPort. Space Debris Elimination (SpaDE). Project 4347. https://techport.nasa.gov/projects/4347
  14. NASA TechPort. Rapid Response Debris Removal Using Reconfigurable Space-Based Laser Networks. Project 156377. https://techport.nasa.gov/projects/156377
  15. NASA TechPort. Adaptive Just-in-time Collision Avoidance via Targeted Dust Cloud Deployments from Orbital Platforms. Project 156380. https://techport.nasa.gov/projects/156380
  16. Optimal Active Debris Removal Mission Planning to Inform Policy Decisions. (2025). Acta Astronautica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.11.050
  17. Large-scale Object Selection and Trajectory Planning for Multi-target Space Debris Removal Missions. (2020). Acta Astronautica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.01.032
  18. Bi-level Evolutionary Framework for Designing Multi-debris Active Removal Missions. (2026). Acta Astronautica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2026.04.002
  19. Improvement of Orbital Data Precision and Accuracy. (2025). Acta Astronautica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.01.003